Now I'm not saying either will happen, meaning that I hope that it's not a foregone conclusion that Bush will order an attack on Iran. I really hope he doesn't, but from what I understand, he's determined to strike their before the alleged end of his presidency. I'm worried that if he does, then all hell is going to break loose in the middle east. Dare I say, "WWIII"? Maybe not, but I can't imagine that China would be real happy about it, since they too get oil from Iran. If the Chinese oil supply is threatened, would they not be tempted to protect their "country's interest". What would they do? And you know what would end the war in Iraq? If China, who has the largest standing army in the world (2 million plus), would send a million or two soldiers there and tell the Americans, "Get the fuck out! NOW!" Other than that, the neocons are going to continue to terrorize the Iraqi people as long as they can. IF there are elections for president in 2008, I don't believe that there will be ANY difference in the State's war policy than there is right now, even if a Democrat gets in. Iran will probably slow oil production WAY down, thus affecting oil supplies of several countries, Chavez will likely follow, and 'things' ARE going to get messy (in death AND financially). Count on it! Speaking of the attitude of the soldiers in Iraq, I just heard on the news that one told a reporter that "all Iraqi men are 'insurgents'", and it was time to "step-up the violence". I've also heard that *80%* of the violence in Iraq and Afghanistan is because the States invaded Iraq souly for their oil, under the guise of "regime" change against a man THEY put into power! And they attacked a country who was absolutely NO THREAT to the States of America, and that is totally against International Law. But the Bush regime believes that THEY are the ONLY world super power, so they get to make the rules. Meaning they feel they're perfectly justified in doing whatever the fuck they want to do, whether that attacking other sovereign nations or breaking International Law. They think they are ABOVE THE LAW of the world. And those democrats that "we" elected in 2006? Spineless rubber stampers! :-(
You know how 'they' say, "Why don't Americans take to the street in protests?" Well, they do, the mainstream media just doesn't cover them because they don't want "The People" to feel empowered. So here are a few links to said protests...
-
immigrants protesting in Los Angeles and elsewhere
-
Sat 08/7/2006 Sacramento USA Photos
-
Wed 12/7/2006 Start of Israeli attack on Lebanon
-
Wed 12/7/2006 Boston USA
-
Sat 15/7/2006 Sacramento USA
-
Sun 16/7/2006 Los Angeles USA
-
Mon 17/7/2006 Chicago USA
-
Mon 17/7/2006 Houston, USA
Reports: I | II – Photos: I | II | III | IV -
Mon 17/7/2006 San Francisco USA
Photos: I | II | III | IV
And the list just goes on and on. Check out other protests.
Tags: Iran, wwIII, protests, protesting, mainstream media, Iraq, oil, terrorism, terrorists, 2008 election, republicans, democrats, politics, government, congress, senate, rubber stamping, unitied states
No comments:
Post a Comment